I want to warn you in advance. For those of you who have read my work on this blog, you know I like to make my biases clear up front. I think it allows readers to take what I say with a grain of salt, to know that I don’t purport to come from a place of objective, impersonal judgement. I write on issues about which I feel very strongly. I write with as much factual support and logic as possible, but my bias always comes through in one way or another. This article is no different. I stand in firm, unwavering support for marriage equality. I also dislike the idea of states and, more importantly, the amount of power the states have in the current political system. Those two beliefs figure heavily into this post. Please discuss with me, tell me how my views conflict with yours. I don’t want to pretend that I am some sort of authority. I’m just a guy who cares a lot about politics. I don’t want to pontificate about how much righter my opinions are than yours, I want to say my piece and hear yours.
Well, with that bit of housekeeping out of the way….
My reaction to today’s landmark Supreme Court decisions — Hollingsworth v. Perry (Prop 8) and United States v. Windsor (DOMA) — were rather mixed. On one hand, the federal government has now afforded same-sex marriage the same respect and benefits as “traditional” marriage. Plus, the roster of states (and DC) that observe and perform same-sex marriage has gone from 13 to 14. Those are both big wins; they are arguably bellwethers of more victories on the horizon. But, both came with a distressing double-edge: the Supreme Court has given all the power in the same-sex marriage debate to the states.
Continue reading →